Understanding Reconsideration Requests for IRCC Decisions: A Guide for Applicants

Every year, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) processes a vast number of immigration applications. When an application is refused, applicants are often left with questions, particularly if they believe the decision was due to procedural error or oversight. While judicial review is one option, applicants may also submit a reconsideration request to IRCC, asking the original decision-maker to review their case.

This article provides an in-depth look at reconsideration requests, examining the legal basis, relevant case law, and procedural considerations that applicants need to keep in mind. With this foundation, we aim to empower applicants to make informed choices when dealing with IRCC refusals.

What is a Reconsideration Request?

A reconsideration request is an informal appeal to IRCC to review a decision without requiring a new application. It’s a discretionary request, meaning IRCC is not required to grant it. Unlike judicial review, which is conducted by the Federal Court, a reconsideration request asks the IRCC decision-maker to review the original case and potentially modify their decision based on new information or errors that may have impacted the initial decision.

The Doctrine of Functus Officio and Its Exceptions

The legal principle of functus officio, meaning “having performed one’s duty,” generally restricts decision-makers from revisiting cases once a final decision has been rendered. However, Canadian courts have established that this doctrine does not strictly apply to administrative decisions like those of immigration officers. This key principle was affirmed in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Kurukkal (2010 FCA 230), which clarified that immigration officers retain some discretion to reconsider a decision in light of new, material information.

In Kurukkal, the applicant requested reconsideration after a refusal on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. While the initial response cited functus officio as grounds to deny the request, the Federal Court of Appeal ultimately ruled that functus officio does not apply as strictly to immigration cases, allowing for reconsideration in “exceptional” circumstances. This ruling underscores that immigration officers may reopen cases when procedural fairness issues or significant new evidence arises, particularly if it was unavailable or undisclosed at the time of the original decision.

Relevant Case Law Defining IRCC Discretion

Several notable cases further define the parameters for IRCC officers when considering reconsideration requests:

1. Young Marr v. Canada (2011 FC 367): Building on Kurukkal, Justice Zinn ruled that visa officers should exercise discretion to reconsider a decision if new, material information is provided shortly after the original decision. This case introduced an important standard of fairness, emphasizing that requiring an applicant to start a new application process is not always practical or just, especially when the new evidence clarifies the original submission.

2. Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada), 2013 FC 879: This case reaffirmed the Marr decision, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness and common sense when reconsidering applications. The court held that officers must assess the relevance of new information without requiring an entirely new application, particularly if the evidence could substantially impact the decision outcome.

3. Arango v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada), 2015 FCA: In cases where reconsideration requests were submitted following a judicial review application, the court held that officers may revisit decisions in “appropriate circumstances,” as the doctrine of functus officio does not apply rigidly to administrative decisions. This case emphasized that procedural flexibility is warranted to ensure fairness.

IRCC’s Guidelines on Reconsideration Requests

IRCC’s internal guidelines provide a structured approach to reconsideration requests, instructing officers to follow specific procedures and assess cases based on a variety of factors. These factors include:

• Procedural Fairness: IRCC guidelines direct officers to review whether procedural fairness was maintained in the original decision. For instance, if the applicant did not receive adequate opportunity to respond to concerns raised in their application, reconsideration may be warranted.

• Clerical or Administrative Errors: If an error, such as a clerical mistake or oversight, affected the decision, reconsideration is appropriate. An example would be if the officer inadvertently used incorrect information or lacked the delegated authority to make the decision.

• New Evidence: Applicants can provide new, reliable evidence to support their request. This evidence must be material to the decision and may include recent documentation that substantiates the applicant’s eligibility. IRCC distinguishes between evidence that could have been submitted with the original application and truly new evidence, such as documents created after the original decision.

• Timing of Request: The timeliness of a reconsideration request is another key factor. Requests made soon after the original decision are more likely to succeed, as the details remain fresh and the process does not impose undue delays. Additionally, officers are less likely to reconsider if a significant amount of time has elapsed since the initial decision, except in unique circumstances.

• Misrepresentation Concerns: When reviewing a request, officers consider the applicant’s history of compliance and integrity in their submissions. Any evidence of misrepresentation or fraud in prior applications may weigh against reconsideration, as maintaining the integrity of the immigration system is paramount.

Two-Step Process for Reconsideration Decisions

Recent Federal Court cases, such as Wophill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) (2023 FC 1618), have developed a two-step process for reconsideration requests:

1. Initial Decision: The officer first determines whether there are grounds to reconsider. This involves reviewing whether the applicant has provided compelling reasons for the IRCC to revisit the original decision. This step is largely procedural, assessing factors like new evidence or fairness issues.

2. Reconsideration on the Merits: If the initial step is satisfied, the officer proceeds to reassess the decision’s merits. Here, new evidence is evaluated alongside the original case file to determine if the decision should be altered.

Importance of Documentation and GCMS Records

To maintain transparency and accountability, IRCC officers document every step of the reconsideration process in the Global Case Management System (GCMS). The guidelines instruct officers to note the reasons for their decision, including why they chose to accept or deny the reconsideration request. This documentation is critical, especially if the applicant subsequently seeks judicial review, as it demonstrates that IRCC took the request seriously and applied a consistent approach. These records also crucial for the applicants and for us lawyers to understand the reasons for refusals and set a strategy for reconsideration request and even JR processes.

Practical Steps for Applicants Seeking Reconsideration

Applicants who wish to submit a reconsideration request should approach the process carefully. The following steps can help strengthen their case:

1. Review the Refusal Letter: Understanding the specific grounds for refusal is crucial, as it allows applicants to address any identified issues directly.

2. Compile New Evidence: Collect reliable evidence that was not available at the time of the original decision. For example, new financial statements, additional work references, or evidence of a change in circumstances can significantly bolster a reconsideration request.

3. Prepare a Clear Submission: The request should clearly outline the grounds for reconsideration and provide relevant documentation. A structured, professional submission increases the likelihood of a favorable response.

4. Seek Legal Advice: Due to the complexity of IRCC’s requirements, consulting an immigration lawyer can help applicants frame a more effective reconsideration request. Legal support can clarify procedural fairness and ensure compliance with IRCC guidelines.

Judicial Review as an Alternative Option

If a reconsideration request is denied, applicants may pursue judicial review through the Federal Court. This process is a formal assessment of whether the original decision was made fairly and in accordance with the law. Unlike reconsideration, judicial review involves a more thorough examination and requires a solid legal foundation to succeed. An immigration lawyer’s expertise is often essential for navigating judicial review, as they can present a compelling case that highlights procedural or substantive errors in the original decision.

Conclusion: Weighing Reconsideration and Legal Support

A reconsideration request can be a valuable opportunity for applicants to address mistakes or present new evidence in support of their application. However, success depends on the strength of the case, the timing of the request, and adherence to IRCC’s guidelines. Legal support often proves beneficial in complex cases, as immigration lawyers can ensure that the request aligns with procedural fairness standards and addresses relevant legal precedents.

At Blacksy Immigration Law Firm, we specialize in guiding clients through reconsideration requests and judicial review processes. We are committed to providing honest, realistic, and effective solutions for those navigating Canadian immigration. If your application has been refused, contact us to explore your options for a reconsideration request or judicial review.

—o—

About the Author

I’m Ahmet Faruk Ocak, a Canadian immigration lawyer and the founder of Blacksy Immigration Law Firm 🌊. 

At Blacksy, we specialize in providing honest, straightforward, and tailored immigration solutions to individuals and businesses worldwide. Our brand promise is simple: no unnecessary fuss, no false hopes, and no empty promises—just realistic, reliable guidance to help you achieve your immigration goals.

Whether you’re expanding your business to Canada, transferring top talent, or planning your future here, we’re here to guide you with precision, transparency, and care.

Visit us at www.blacksyimmigration.com to learn more or to start your journey.